Smoking vs salt consumption: A choice of two devils or one good and the other bad?
It is very easy to dismiss any association between smoking
and salt consumption in terms of harm they can cause to the body. There is widespread consensus that smoking is
never good for humans. Smoking is
associated with heart diseases such as atherosclerosis. In contrast, consumption of salt can be
beneficial to the body. Salt helps in the
regulation of blood pressure and the nervous system. These perceptions have wider implications in
health policies regarding smoking and salt consumption.
Smoking in public places has been banned by a number of western
countries including England, Scotland and some states in the United States. There are also calls for smoking in cars to
be banned to protect non-smokers particularly children from the harmful effect
of smoking. Furthermore, displaying of brands
on cigarette packets has also been banned in countries such as Australia and
United Kingdom to discourage young people from smoking.
Similar steps have not been taken to educate the public
about the dangers of salt consumption and restrict access to sources of salty
food such as fast food restaurants. There
is also no mandatory requirement for fast food restaurants to include limited amount
of salt in their food. In the absence of
this regulation food restaurants can add unacceptable amount of salt to their
food at the expense of consumers’ health.
This lack of coherent policies on excessive salt consumption
and the dangers of consuming too much salt including the risk of hypertension
and stroke indicates that a lot of people can easily exceed the recommended
daily allowance (RDA) for salt which varies from countries to countries. Salt is present in almost every food we eat. There is salt in food we buy from supermarket
and cook at home. There is also salt in
fast food we buy from restaurants. We
consume salt every time whether we are eating at home or eating out with
friends or family members without knowing the amount of salt we consume.
Unlike people eating salty food without recognising it, smokers
seem to be fully aware of their action when they engage in smoking behaviour and
can choose not to smoke at any particular period of time. The only people who may not be aware that
they are smoking indirectly (passive smoking) are non smokers who may be present
in the environment where smoking is being done or has recently taken place. Thus, people who do not choose to smoke or are
not present in a smoking environment cannot be direct victims of smoking.
These show that there is bias attitude against smoking and in
favour of excessive salt consumption even though people are more aware of the
dangers posed by smoking than dangers posed by excessive salt consumption. It is important therefore that people are
educated about the dangers of excessive salt consumption in the same way that
people are informed about the risk of smoking.
Comments
Post a Comment