Ecclestone Bribes German Court For Bribery Charges: Is German Legal System Different From Developing Countries’ Legal Systems?

-
The acquitting of Mr Bernie Ecclestone, Formula one boss, by German Court of bribery allegations this week came as a surprise to many observers.  Mr Ecclestone was accused of offering bribes to ensure that a company he favours can buy a stake in Formula one.  Before the case was dropped, many observers had thought that he would be punished like his accomplice, Gerhard Gribkowsky, who is currently serving prison term for similar bribery allegation involving $44m.  However, the German prosecutor dropped all the bribery charges against Mr Ecclestone after receiving $100m (one hundred million dollars) settlement payment from him.  
Ecclestone, the boss of formula one
Bernie Ecclestone

There is no doubt that the German court wanted to prosecute Mr Ecclestone because of the court belief in the rule of law comprising of the notions of equality before the law and similar punishment for similar offences.  However, the decision to accept the $100m settlement payment from Mr Ecclestone and close the bribery case against him whilst his co-conspirator languishes in jail undermines the notion of equality before the law under the German legal system.  The notion of equality before the law states that no person is above the law.  If Ms Jane is punished for shoplifting Mr James should also be punished for pick pocketing.   This is regardless of their social status or wealth. 

The inability of the German court to convict Mr Ecclestone also confirms that dissimilar punishment for similar offences is possible within the German legal system.  This goes against the Western system of criminal justice which is premised on the notion that similar crimes should attract similar punishment.  If Mr Gribkowsky is sent to prison for offering a bribe Mr Ecclestone should also be sent to prison for similar offences. No amount of money should release him from this punishment.
Gerhard Gribkowsky, the accomplice of Mr Ecclestone
Gerhard Gribkowsky


Having failed to convict Mr Ecclestone for bribery allegations the German legal system further demonstrates that it is similar to the legal systems of developing countries.  In developing countries, the rich bribe their way out of prison for heinous crimes including bribery by paying court officials while the poor, who cannot pay for justice, suffer in prison for petty offences such as shoplifting.

However, there is one major difference between the German legal system and developing countries’ legal systems in relation to acceptance of payment for offences.  In the German legal system, the state receives the settlement payment for crimes whereas in developing countries judges or prosecutors pocket the payment for charges to be dropped.  Consequently, settlement payment for crimes in Germany is used by the state for meaningful activities while in developing countries settlement payment for crimes goes into the private pockets of court officials and prosecutors.


Regardless of who receives the crime payment, one thing seems to be common to all the legal systems around the world.  In every legal system, there are two separate laws for people.  One is for the rich while the other is for the poor.    There is the law that provides for the poor to pay for crime in prison and there is the law that allows the rich to pay for crimes using his or her wealth.  Therefore, before you commit any crime think about the likely consequences of it.  You are likely to go to prison if you are poor irrespective of whether you are in Germany or developing countries.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spanish Dog Fouling Law: Are Spanish Politicians Pursuing The Wrong Agenda?

-
Image
 Dog fouling Spain has some of the strictest laws regarding pets possession in Europe. One of its laws governing animal possession in Spain, for example, bans having exotic creatures as pets and requires dog, cat and ferret owners to declare their animals to the authority within three months of bringing them into the country. Until recently, however, Spain has no law nor sanction for failure to clean up after dog fouling in public places. It was up to dog owners whether to clean up such mess. This has now changed following the introduction of the dog fouling law. The new law states that the fine for any person failing to clean up after his or her dog fouling in a public place such as a park or kids play ground should be 1500 euros. The rationale for this legislation is to deter dog owners from leaving their dogs messing up public places such as parks. Regular visitors to parks can testify how the sight of such dog foul can be an eyesore. However, asking dog owners wh...
Read more

Social Media Networks: Calls For Tighter Regulations

-
One of the most fascinating technological inventions of the twenty first century is the development of social media networks such as YouTube, Twitter, and Face book. These social media networks make it possible for people to meet new people and make friends, locate old friends and family members, or to form a relationship that can result in marriage. They also provide a platform in the form of advertising for conducting businesses. Despite these benefits provided by the social media networks certain things can go awfully wrong on the networks. The most recent example of how the social media network can be turned into a weapon of criminality is the case last week involving threatening rape and murder messages sent to a number of British women on Twitter. Feminists are attempting to use this incident to rally for support for tighter regulations on activities being conducted within social media networks. Is it possible to control activities within these networks? Having legislat...
Read more

RAT Spyware – A Programme That Monitors Every Aspect Of Your Life.

-
Image
 Cyber Criminal For many of us who use it, the computer is an invaluable asset to us. We use it to do a wide range of online activities ranging from shopping to banking to booking a holiday flight. Criminals are aware of this great importance of the computer to us. As a result, they have devised a programme called RAT to harm us while we are enjoying the computer. The acronym “RAT” refers to Remote Access Trojan. RAT is one of the latest spyware programmes used by cyber criminals to commit different types of crimes online. Cyber criminals for example can use RAT to control a web cam from a remote location even though the web cam has been switched off by its owner. RAT is also used for more sinister activities such as stealing bank account details stored on the computer. RAT is usually downloaded and installed on the victim’s computer when the victim is downloading what he or she thinks is innocuous or harmless programme. Once installed, RAT works in the background a...
Read more