Sexism Row over Page 3 of the Sun Newspaper: Campaigners go for the Soft Target

-
sun newspaper
For some months now the page 3 of the Sun Newspaper which usually contains semi naked photos of young British models largely in their late teens and early twenties has been a subject of debate in the British media.  Last week, a sister newspaper announced that the Sun was stopping the publication of this page 3 for good.  Campaigners against the publication were delighted over this news.  However, this jubilation was short lived after the Sun newspaper came out to dismiss the claims of the demise of its page 3.

The number of people against the publication of page 3 of the Sun newspaper is large.  As of last week, it was rumoured that up to 250,000 people have signed up to an online petition asking the Sun newspaper to scrape the page 3.  For these campaigners, having nude photos of young women in one of the leading British newspapers does not only belittles women but also is sexism dating back to 45years ago and should be stopped.  There is no room for this type of misogyny in the 21st century argued the campaigners.

While it is important for the Sun newspaper to consider this demand from a quarter of a million people it is also important to consider some questions.  Who are these campaigners numbering up to a quarter of a million?  Are they regular readers of the Sun newspaper?   Have they signed up to the petition through dubious means? 
sexism


Providing answers to these questions is important considering the problems often associated with online petitions.   Online petitions, for example, can be marred by multiple user sign-ups, in which one user will create multiple identities using pseudo names.   There is also the issue of people soliciting for petition against an issue from friends, colleagues or family members.  Currently, it is difficult to establish the extent to which any of these factors may have influenced the campaigners who had signed the online petition against the Sun newspaper.

In addition to these problems relating to online petitions, the Sun newspaper is unlikely to concede to the demands of the campaigners in view of the fact that the paper has a very large reader database.  It is estimated that about 2 million people across Britain buy the newspaper every day.  It is possible that one of the factors attracting these readers to the newspaper is the page 3.  Therefore, it is unlikely that the Sun will upset these readers by stopping the publication of the page 3 without a fight.   

Aside from the financial consequences that may follow the scraping of page 3, the Sun can also dismiss the demands of the campaigners against page 3 by relying on the defence of freedom of expression and democracy.  Under the freedom of expression, newspapers are entitled to publicise any material providing such a material does not contravene the law.  The page 3 of the Sun newspaper has not been found to violate any applicable British law, so asking for this material to be stopped is tantamount to censoring freedom of expression.  

Regarding democracy, the number of campaigners against the publication of page 3 of the Sun newspaper is far lower than the number of readers of the page 3.  Two hundred and fifty thousand campaigners compared to 2 million readers.  The Sun therefore can rely on this evidence to justify its continuous publication of the page 3 since democracy implies that the wishes of the majority should always triumph over the wishes of the minority.

Even though the Sun were to concede to the demands of the campaigners and scrap its page 3, the availability of nude photos of women will still be readily available online.  Among other sources, nude photos of women will continue to be featured on massage therapy websites, dating websites and pornographic websites.   This raises the question about whether the campaigners against page 3 are going for the soft target, leaving the hard target untouched.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spanish Dog Fouling Law: Are Spanish Politicians Pursuing The Wrong Agenda?

-
Image
 Dog fouling Spain has some of the strictest laws regarding pets possession in Europe. One of its laws governing animal possession in Spain, for example, bans having exotic creatures as pets and requires dog, cat and ferret owners to declare their animals to the authority within three months of bringing them into the country. Until recently, however, Spain has no law nor sanction for failure to clean up after dog fouling in public places. It was up to dog owners whether to clean up such mess. This has now changed following the introduction of the dog fouling law. The new law states that the fine for any person failing to clean up after his or her dog fouling in a public place such as a park or kids play ground should be 1500 euros. The rationale for this legislation is to deter dog owners from leaving their dogs messing up public places such as parks. Regular visitors to parks can testify how the sight of such dog foul can be an eyesore. However, asking dog owners wh
Read more

Social Media Networks: Calls For Tighter Regulations

-
One of the most fascinating technological inventions of the twenty first century is the development of social media networks such as YouTube, Twitter, and Face book. These social media networks make it possible for people to meet new people and make friends, locate old friends and family members, or to form a relationship that can result in marriage. They also provide a platform in the form of advertising for conducting businesses. Despite these benefits provided by the social media networks certain things can go awfully wrong on the networks. The most recent example of how the social media network can be turned into a weapon of criminality is the case last week involving threatening rape and murder messages sent to a number of British women on Twitter. Feminists are attempting to use this incident to rally for support for tighter regulations on activities being conducted within social media networks. Is it possible to control activities within these networks? Having legislat
Read more

Marketing Tricks: How Many Times Have You Fallen Victim?

-
Image
 Fat free food Whereas business owners call them marketing strategies, none business owners regard them as marketing tricks. Regardless of what you like to call them, businesses cannot survive without marketing tricks. Marketing tricks are the flywheel that keeps businesses engine running. We tend not to be concerned about them because of our perception that we are familiar with them and can avoid them. However, a careful look at the marketing tricks used by businesses will reveal that many of us have fallen victims of them in the past and can still fall victim of the malpractice in future. Let us consider two of these popular tricks used in supermarkets. The first marketing trick used by retailers is relating to the slogan “75% reduced fat”. Items labelled 75% reduced fat are often displayed on supermarket shelves. Some of us who are conscious of our health tend to go for them to avoid consuming excess fat. Excess fat in the body is considered to be a risk factor for
Read more